The First Monday In May Apr 2026

The film suggests that the contemporary museum cannot survive on scholarship alone. Wintour’s commodification of culture is the necessary evil that permits Bolton’s curatorial idealism. Yet, the documentary’s editing—which cuts from Bolton reading 18th-century trade records to Wintour approving a seating chart based on “who is dating whom”—clearly signals which labor the filmmaker finds more noble. 3. The Question of Orientalism: A Methodological Failure The film’s most controversial subtext is its handling of cultural appropriation. China: Through the Looking Glass was explicitly framed by Bolton as a Western fantasy of China—a study of chinoiserie rather than an authentic representation. However, the documentary captures a revealing moment of resistance.

Bolton represents the traditional museum ideal: scholarly rigor, aesthetic sensitivity, and a deferential approach to source cultures. In one pivotal scene, Bolton agonizes over a video installation by Chinese artist Yang Fudong, worrying that juxtaposing contemporary Chinese cinema with imperial robes might be “orientalist.” His vocabulary is one of anxiety and reflexivity. The First Monday In May

This paper posits that the film’s primary achievement is its refusal to resolve these tensions. Instead, Rossi presents the Met Gala—and the exhibition it funds—as a ritual of hierarchical reinforcement, where cultural capital (Bourdieu, 1979) is displayed, exchanged, and occasionally challenged. Through a close reading of key sequences, this analysis will demonstrate how the documentary exposes the structural paradoxes of major institutional curation. The documentary’s most explicit dramatic engine is the partnership between Andrew Bolton, the soft-spoken, Oxford-educated curator of the Costume Institute, and Anna Wintour, the monolithic editor-in-chief of Vogue and the gala’s long-time chairperson. The film suggests that the contemporary museum cannot

Conversely, Wintour operates with the efficiency of a political strategist. When Bolton hesitates over a seating chart—debating whether to place a tech CEO next to a Chinese minister—Wintour overrides him: “We need youth. We need noise. We need Instagram.” The film subtly critiques Wintour’s pragmatism while simultaneously acknowledging that her celebrity-driven machinery generates the $15 million necessary for Bolton’s intellectual project. However, the documentary captures a revealing moment of

Andrew Rossi’s 2016 documentary, The First Monday in May , provides an unprecedented behind-the-scenes look at the creation of the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s 2015 Costume Institute exhibition, China: Through the Looking Glass , and its accompanying gala. This paper argues that the film functions as a complex text on the tensions between high art and commercial fashion, Eastern and Western cultural authority, and the invisible labor that sustains the spectacle of the Met Gala. By analyzing the film’s depiction of curator Andrew Bolton’s academic rigor versus celebrity chairperson Anna Wintour’s branding machinery, this paper explores how the documentary both critiques and celebrates the economization of museum culture in the 21st century. 1. Introduction On the first Monday of May 2015, the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Greek and Roman galleries were temporarily decontextualized. Hundreds of mannequins draped in Yves Saint Laurent, Guo Pei, and Alexander McQueen stood alongside ancient Chinese bronzes and classical marble statues. The occasion was China: Through the Looking Glass , the highest-attended fashion exhibition in the Met’s history. Andrew Rossi’s documentary, The First Monday in May , captures the eight-month struggle to mount this exhibition, framing it as a battleground for three distinct conflicts: art versus artifact, scholarship versus celebrity, and appropriation versus homage.

The film’s title itself is ironic. The “First Monday in May” is the Met Gala—an event that, in 2015, had become a global media spectacle. But the film spends only its final 25 minutes on the Gala itself. The preceding 65 minutes are devoted to research, installation, negotiation, and doubt. Rossi’s argument, therefore, is that the real story is not the red carpet, but the invisible labor and ethical compromise that make the red carpet possible.