Try ROT-8: t(20)→12=l h(8)→0 (a)?? No, mod26: 8-8=0=a, m(13)→5=e, y(25)→17=q, l(12)→4=d → "l a e q d" no.
But the phrase length is: thmyl (5) brnamj (6) ywr (3) frydwm (6) mhkr (4) alakhdr (7)
Given “alakhdr” clearly looks like “al-akhdar”, I’d say the phrase might be:
Given the time, my guess: this is a simple substitution where each letter is replaced by the next or previous in alphabet but deliberately misspelled. But “thmyl brnamj ywr frydwm mhkr alakhdr” — sounds like possibly “They will bring you freedom, maker, al-akhdar” — but “thmyl” = “they will”? thmyl → t h m y l could be t h e y w i l l if e=m? No. thmyl brnamj ywr frydwm mhkr alakhdr
or something similar.
But reverse thinking: “alakhdr” plaintext could be “al akhdar” (الاخضر). So “mhkr” maybe “mhkr” → “akhdar”? That would require m→a (-12), h→k (+3) — inconsistent.
So “thmyl” → “guzly” — no.
Let me try to see if it's a simple substitution cipher (like Atbash, Caesar, etc.).
Given “alakhdr” → if we apply ROT-3: a→x, l→i, a→x, k→h, h→e, d→a, r→o → “xixheao” no.
But easier: given the “feature:” before it, maybe this is a name? Let’s check the last word “alakhdr” — looks like Arabic name “al-akhdar” meaning “the green”. Indeed, “alakhdr” could be “al akhḍar” (الاخضر). Try ROT-8: t(20)→12=l h(8)→0 (a)
t → g h → u m → z y → l l → y
So maybe the whole phrase is Arabic names in English letters but encoded.
Try ROT-7: t(20) → 13=m h(8) → 1=a m(13) → 6=f y(25) → 18=r l(12) → 5=e Word = m a f r e → "mafre"? Not English. But “thmyl brnamj ywr frydwm mhkr alakhdr” —
Let’s test the first word “thmyl” with ROT: t (20) → maybe m (13) if -7: t(20)-7=13=m h(8)-7=1=a? No, that gives m? Wait, h(8)-7=1=a → but we have “thmyl” 2nd letter is h in cipher → so if h→a, that’s -7, then m→f? Let's check properly:
Could it be a cipher where each letter is shifted by a consistent amount?