This is a radical act. In conventional memoir (say, Nabokov’s Speak, Memory ), the author is the master of time. In Nada Se Opone A La Noche , time is a wound. Jodorowsky writes in fragments because his psyche is a fragment. He argues that the family is not a tree, but a rhizome—a tangled knot of repetition compulsion.
Nada Se Opone A La Noche is therefore a grimoire of healing. It rejects the therapeutic cliché of “closure.” There is no closure in Jodorowsky’s universe. There is only transparency . By making the secret visible, the secret loses its venom. Critics have accused Jodorowsky of narcissism and fabulism. Does he have the right to invent his mother’s psychosis? Is it ethical to turn his father’s misery into a Tarot card? These are valid questions. Jodorowsky’s response is essentially shamanic: The cure is more important than the record. Nada Se Opone A La Noche
In the final pages, Jodorowsky writes that his ancestors are not dead. They are sitting in the room with him, watching him write. They are hungry. They want to be seen. By writing this book, he feeds them. He gives them the attention the real world never did. This is a radical act
Jodorowsky does not psychoanalyze her. He performs an exorcism . By writing her lies down verbatim—by recording her delusions that she was a secret heiress or a lost princess—he drains them of their power. He uses the literary equivalent of the psychomagic he would later develop as a therapeutic practice. He confronts the night of the mother by refusing to look away. The novel is notoriously difficult to read linearly. It jumps from the 19th-century Ukraine to 1940s Santiago to a metaphorical discussion of the Golem. Characters vanish and reappear as ghosts. Jodorowsky addresses the reader directly, admitting that he is altering details because the “emotional truth” is more important than the factual record. Jodorowsky writes in fragments because his psyche is